TOTOS SEEP Grant EE/ESE Program Descriptions
Sustainability and Environmental Education for Pre-Service (SEEP)
|
Information needed |
Information to share |
|---|---|
|
Name(s) of instructor(s) |
Judith Morrison |
|
Name of university |
Washington State University TriCities |
|
Level of preparation for the program being described: elementary, middle school, high school (or combination) |
Elementary and middle school (K-8) |
|
University course number |
T&L 371 |
|
University course title |
Teaching Elementary Science |
|
University course catalogue description |
Teaching methods, materials, and content in elementary and middle school science |
|
Objectives (big ideas are fine) |
To introduce preservice teachers to strategies they can use to teach elementary and middle school students about field studies, environmental science, and sustainability. Also, to increase the preservice teachers’ awareness of the need to teach these concepts to students and to increase their confidence to include these ideas in their science teaching. |
|
Description of the experience(s) the pre-service teachers had to learn EE-ESE strategies (This is the main, detailed description) |
|
|
Materials/equipment needed for the pre-service teacher experience (include technology that may have been used) |
Field Studies/PLT activities: thermometers, meter sticks, notebooks, data loggers Sustainability: Sustainable Design Project Teacher Manual from OSPI |
|
Were preK-12 children involved? (Yes or no). If yes, describe their involvement and ages. |
No |
|
Was this an indoor or outdoor project (or both)? Describe the setting. |
Both |
|
Were other subject area professors involved? Yes or no. If yes, what subjects were integrated? How? |
No |
|
Were there community/ agency/institution partners? Yes or no. If yes, how was the partnership structured? |
No |
|
How was the program evaluated? What did the pre-service teachers have to say? |
The preservice teachers were graded on their participation and the work they produced in each of the activities. The main evaluation tool was their science notebooks which contained most of the work they did outside and in the classroom. The preservice teachers also wrote formal reflection papers on the activities and designed a field study investigation. The feedback I received from them was generally that they wanted to include these ideas in their future teaching and appreciated the introduction to the activities but still felt unprepared and not very confident about doing these with their students. |
|
Other? |
|
|
If another grant was written to support your EE-ESE work, what types of things would you hope to accomplish? |
The same type of activities and class work would be necessary but certainly more time would be spent so that preservice teachers would gain confidence to teach these concepts. It would also be beneficial to have a single course that allowed the teachers to learn how to incorporate projects across many areas (science, math, language arts, and social studies) into their teaching. |
Thank you!











