Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness

  1. Mission and Goals
    1. Report the department's mission statement and describe any changes made to it in the last three years.
      The Department of Biological Sciences provides the biological component of the liberal arts education at Central Washington University. We promote student understanding of biological concepts relevant to the individual and to society, and foster an appreciation of scientific inquiry. Evolution is the unifying theme of our curriculum. Our students obtain a broad education covering a wide variety of biological disciplines. Our teaching philosophy and facilities support a rich education experience with small class sizes, hands-on experience, regular interaction with expert faculty, and opportunities for both undergraduate and graduate research. We offer a full complement of competitive pre-professional programs, strong programs in regional field biology, and a high-quality program for secondary biology educators.

    2. Describe, in a short paragraph, how the university's and college's missions guide the activities and plans of the department or program.
      The goals and activities of the department have been arrived at through both a top-down and a bottom-up process.  The university and college missions set the background and environment for the direction and scope of the department's goals and activities.  Student, faculty and staff input contribute to the specifics of the program along with their corresponding activities.

    3. List and briefly describe the department's current goals and objectives for the next three years, identifying changes made since the last program review.
      1. Develop, implement and maintain a continual process of program review in which all faculty members review and revise the mission, goals, and objectives of the department, develop strategies on how to best accomplish our goals and objectives, develop tools to assess our success, and establish departmental procedures and policies to create more informed and efficient decision-making. 
      
      2. Offer an undergraduate program that provides the knowledge, skills, and appreciation of the biological sciences for biology majors, general education students, and students in other majors whose programs require biology. 
      
      3. Provide a rigorous program of graduate training at the Master’s level. 
      
      4. Maintain a group of faculty capable of providing instruction in the three broad areas of biology: (1) Cell and Molecular Biology, (2) Organismal Biology, and (3) Ecology. Within the faculty there should be knowledge of all major groups of organisms and all levels of biological organization. 
      
      5. Enhance opportunities for faculty scholarship, research, and development. The ability of the Department to provide an enriched, diverse learning environment in the biological sciences for majors and general education students is directly related to the vitality, expertise, and diversity of its personnel. Existing faculty must be provided with the opportunity to continue to develop their teaching and research skills. 
      
      6. Obtain the necessary resources to carry out our mission and goals. 
      
      7. Provide services to other areas within the University, community, and region. 

  2. Planning and Effectiveness
    1. Describe the department's planning process and the strategies used in evaluating the activities of the department.
      Check All That Apply        
             

      
      

    2. Describe how the results of the evaluation process are used to improve the programs and activities of the department. Give examples where appropriate.
      As an ultimate measure of how well we have achieved our goals we are beginning to assess our students at the end of their degrees and at 1-5 years post-graduation.  The end of major assessment is in the form of a national standardized test and the post-graduation assessment is in the form of a survey.  In addition to these assessments, we are planning on implementing a procedure where we can track the careers of our graduates.  

    3. Reflect on the department's overall effectiveness in reaching its goals.

  3. Analysis of Previous Program Reviews
    1. List the primary recommendations from the last program review. Describe implementation of recommendations, and if not implemented, describe the reason.


    2. Accomplishments. Summarize, in no more than a page, up to ten of the primary accomplishments of the department in the last three years.
      1. We have hired 5 new tenure-track faculty since 1988. An additional faculty search is in process this academic year. 
      
      2. We argued for, and received, approval to hire two new staff members important to our departmental operations: an office assistant and engineering technologist. 
      
      3. We appointed the 1998-99 interim chair to a full 4-year term beginning fall of 1998 and expiring in 2003. This appointment was made after a failed outside search for a chair. 
      
      4. We argued for, and received, approval to convert a part-time adjunct position to a regular 9-month non-tenure-track position 
      
      5. The department moved from its old quarters into the new Science Building. 
      
      6. In June 2000, the departments programs and operations were reviewed by two members of the Council of Undergraduate Research (CUR). The final report is included in the appendix. 
      
      7. We have continued to review and revise our curriculum. One major change was to consolidate courses labeled BISC (Biological Sciences), BOT (botany) and ZOOL (zoology) into a single prefix (BIOL), reflecting our view that the department is a unified biology department rather than a collection of biological specialities. We have developed several new courses, and deleted courses that are no longer priorities.
      
      8. We have updated all student handouts, including course requirements for degree programs, specialization within programs, and student handbooks (both undergraduate and graduate.)
       
      9. We created a department web site and links. (www.cwu.edu/biology/) 
      
      10. We developed undergraduate and graduate posters advertising biology programs, and mailed them to high schools and colleges throughout our western United States. (See appendix.) 
      
      11. Our staff and faculty continue to host and provide scientific tours for approximately 1000 K-12 students each year. The students come from both public and private schools in Washington and neighboring states. In addition we also commonly provide tours requested by parent and business groups and legislators. 
      
      12. Our faculty has increased their efforts to obtain extra funding. Consequently, the number of awards has greatly increased in the last few years. See Section III-D, and CVs and University Partnerships in appendix. 
      
      13. We have greatly increased our efforts in mentoring students and involving them in research projects. The increasing number of SOURCE presentations reflect this effort by the faculty.
      
      14. Specific faculty and students have received a number of honors.
      
      15. We continue to manage and award yearly scholarships from the Dennis W. Farrell Foundation to pre-medical students. 
      
      16. The Natural Science Seminar series continues to be an important biweekly event which brings students, faculty and members of the local community together. 
      
      17. We have expanded our summer course offerings, which has been helpful to students and profitable for the department. 
      
      18. The annual Greenhouse Open House continues to be held and draws many individuals from across campus and from the Ellensburg community. 
      
      19. With financial assistance from the administration, we redesigned and installed new equipment for the large aquaria in the foyer of the science building.
      
      20. Members of our faculty played a leading role in organizing and presenting the first “Faculty and Graduate Student Research and Scholarly Achievements Conference” in the spring of 2002. 
      
      21. The department continues to provide identification services (plants, animals, fungi and microbes) for individuals and agencies. 
      
      22. The department developed, implemented and expanded field course offerings for majors, including: Regional Natural History, Field Techniques, Biomes, Desert Ecology and Coral Reef Ecology. 
      
      23. The department developed, and implemented laboratory course offerings for majors.
      
      24. The department developed and implemented a number of university enrichment courses.
      
      25. We hosted the Biology Seminar Series for three years bringing in speakers from the Northwest. 
      
      26. This year we initiated the Phil Dumas Lecture series which will feature internationally recognized researchers. 
      
      27. The Department has organized and implemented at least two faculty retreats to discuss programs, curricula and other issues. 


    3. Challenges. Summarize, in no more than a page, up to five of the primary challenges faced by the department in the last three years.
      1. We continue work on core curriculum issues and course requirements in three areas of specialization. 
      
      2. Continue work on developing an assessment program that better measures the effectiveness of our programs.
       
      3. Increased funding, especially in goods and services, is critical for the following reasons: 
      
           a. Van replacement and/or for van rental from motorpool
           b. Equipment maintenance and replacement
           c. Replacement of computers and software upgrades
       
      4. This year the department is faced with finding and appointing a new chair. 
      
      5. Over the next two years, the department will likely have to find replacements for two tenure-track faculty, two phased retirees, and at least one staff member. 
      
      6. The department will seek funding for two additional, half-time staff: a computer/website technician (50/50 biology & chemistry), and a curator of collections. 

Standard Two: Educational Program and Its Effectiveness

  1. In a brief paragraph, describe how the department's academic programs are compatible with the university's mission.

    1. The Department of Biological Sciences at Central Washington University has high standards of instruction that prepare undergraduate and graduate students for successful post-graduate lives. The Department, consistent with the mission of the University, strives to help students develop lifelong learning skills that will allow them to become productive members of society. A mechanism whereby academic development and lifelong learning occurs is through interactions with our students that begin with excellent teaching. 
  2. Curriculum.
    1. For each program offered by the department, comment on the current curriculum design. How does the curriculum meet the criteria of coherence, breadth, depth, effective sequencing of courses, and synthesis of student learning?
      The B.A. degree is designed to develop breadth in the sciences generally. Students completing the Bachelor of Arts major will find that their strong general background will allow them flexibility career choices. The Bachelor of Arts degree meets the requirements for admission to most graduate schools and medical schools. The B.S. major offers the opportunity to specialize in a field of biology or work toward becoming a high school biology teacher. The degree can be designed to prepare the student for immediate entrance into a chosen profession or for preparation for graduate work. The specific program is to be designed by the student and the appropriate departmental advisor, and must be submitted for approval to the Department of Biological Sciences at least one academic year preceding graduation. We have offered several specializations for Biology majors pursuing a B. S. degree, including General Biology, Environmental Public Health Biology, Ecology, Medical Technology, Microbiology, and Plant Sciences. We are currently working toward consolidating these into three fields of emphasis within biology: cellular and molecular biology, organismal biology, and ecology. 
      
      We also offer a Biology teaching major, which satisfies the Primary endorsement for Biology.  Students taking this major are required to complete the professional education program requirements offered through the Curriculum and Supervision Department. Minors in Biology: Teaching Elementary and Biology: Teaching Secondary are available for students seeking a supporting endorsement in Biology. The department oversees Allied Health Sciences, which advises students in preprofessional programs such as pre-medicine, pre-dentistry, pre-veterinary, and pre-physical therapy. 
    2. Describe how the department ensures the currency of the curriculum by appealing to disciplinary standards, employer needs, graduate school expectations, or professional standards. Where relevant, refer to data from assessment programs, surveys of graduating seniors and alumni, internship or employer surveys, employment or graduate program acceptance rates, and other relevant measures that demonstrate the currency of the curriculum.
      Our faculty members keep the curriculum current and relevant to our students in the following ways: 
           • Review and adoption of new textbooks 
      
           • Incorporation of recent scientific findings (from journals and other sources) into lectures and reading packets for students 
      
           • Incorporation of current faculty research into lectures 
      
           • Discussion of new scientific discoveries and science-related problems reported in newspapers, magazines, and other materials available to the general public 
      
           • Incorporation of materials into labs, lectures, and discussions from web sites of professional scientific and educational organizations 
      
           • Discussion of teaching strategies and course content with colleagues at other universities and at scientific meetings 
      
           • Modification of course content and format based on student and peer evaluations 
      
           • Inviting guest speakers to lecture on current research and applications 
    3. Describe the manner in which faculty members are involved in the initiation, development, and improvement of the department's curriculum. (Also relates to Standard 4.)
      Check all that apply


      Our process for reviewing and modifying the curriculum is described in detail in the Biological Sciences Curriculum Committee Policies and Procedures Guide (see Guide in the appendix.) The Biological Sciences Curriculum Committee (BSCC) is responsible for coordinating all departmental curriculum issues, ranging from the consideration of individual courses to full programs. All such issues are considered in the context of the academic mission and goals of the Department and the University and in terms of current curriculum policy. The BSCC keeps the department chair advised of BSCC meeting agendas and makes recommendations to the faculty for final approval. 
      
      New courses and course changes may be proposed by individual faculty members or groups. The BSCC strongly recommends discussion with the appropriate working group(s), the chair, and colleagues who might also teach the course prior to submission of the proposal to the BSCC. We also recommend requesting feedback from faculty members in other departments that may be affected. The individual or group proposing the new course submits a completed Curriculum Transmittal Form to the chair of the BSCC. 
      
      New programs or program changes may be initiated by individual faculty members or working groups but should be discussed by the faculty as a whole. Initiating faculty member(s) submit proposals plus a draft of the New Program Transmittal Form or Program Change or Deletion Curriculum Transmittal Form to the chair of the BSCC and to the department chair. Once curriculum proposals have been submitted, the BSCC discusses these, and, if appropriate, solicits feedback from other departments potentially affected by the proposal. BSCC distributes a copy or summary of the proposal to faculty and asks the department chair to put the item on the agenda for an upcoming faculty meeting. The BSCC chair presents the proposal at the faculty meeting, facilitates discussion among faculty, revises the transmittal forms as necessary, and monitors progress of the changes through to completion. 
    4. Describe the departmental activities designed to review and improve instructional effectiveness.
      The faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences regularly meet as specific departmental committees and smaller working groups. The Curriculum Committee has facilitated two faculty workshops over the past 4 years. These workshops lasted one to two days and involved all biology faculty. Issues such as course content, integration of key topics throughout the curricula, and coordination of content between courses were among the topics discussed.
  3. Assessment of Undergraduate and Graduate Programs.
    1. Complete the CWU department assessment plan preparation form.
    2. Complete the CWU department assessment report.
    3. Describe how assessment results are communicated to department faculty, to university administrators, and to other constituents.
    4. Describe the manner in which faculty and relevant administrators review and respond to assessment results.
  4. General Education
    1. If the department has courses within the university's general education program, describe the assessment procedures used to assess student progress toward relevant general education student learning goals.
      We offer several courses in general education. Our Fundamentals of Biology course satisfies the breadth requirement for Fundamental Disciplines of Physical and Biological Sciences. In the Patterns and Connections in the Natural World section, we offer Plants in the Modern World, Human Physiology, and Introduction to Evolution; we also contribute faculty to ENST 301 (Earth as an Ecosystem). Our Human Ecology course falls under Applications of Natural Science. Our faculty also participate in teaching ENST 302 (Ecosystems, Resources, Population and Culture).
    2. If the department incorporates general education student learning goals into assessment of students in the major, describe the assessment results.
  5. Graduate Programs. For each graduate program:
    1. Describe the mission and goals of the graduate program and how they are consistent with the mission and goals of the department, college, and university.
      The department offers a Master of Science degree in Biology. The program provides an expanded opportunity for students to prepare themselves for biological careers not normally open to students with only an undergraduate major in biological sciences, prepares students for further graduate work leading to the Ph.D. degree, and allows students to meet the requirements for continuing certification in secondary education, while concurrently earning an M.S. degree in Biology. We offer both thesis and non- thesis options; most students pursue the thesis option. 
      
      
    2. Describe qualities that place the program above the undergraduate level.
    3. List the titles of the master's theses and projects for the most recent two years in which degrees were awarded and provide, if applicable, a copy of the two most recent comprehensive examinations in the program. If comprehensive examinations were used, provide exams and results. Submit two master's theses or project summaries as examples.
  6. Distance Education
    1. Describe the degree to which distance education technology, including interactive video and web-based courses, is used for instruction, in support of departmental programs.
    2. List all courses taught by DE (interactive video) in the past five years including number of sites and number enrolled at each site.
    3. Separately list all courses taught online with number of class sections involved and number of students enrolled in each section.
    4. For the past year, list separately all courses that used Blackboard technology for some of or the entire course and separately list courses that used internet support other than Blackboard.
      Department faculty use technology as a communication and organizational tool that supports excellent teaching. Examples of technology that is being used to help students learn science include course management software (Blackboard), presentation software (i.e. PowerPoint), database software (Microsoft Access and ISI Researchsoft EndNote), assessment software (TestGen EQ and CourseCompass), visualization and modeling software (CHIME and RasMol), statistical software (SPSS), and various websites (either existing or constructed by faculty for their courses). 
    5. Reflect on the effectiveness of distance education relative to face-to-face instructional procedures.
  7. Off-Campus and Special Programs
    1. Describe how the department ensures that the student's learning experience at CWU centers is equivalent to that at the residential campus. Comment on faculty expertise and access to faculty, advisement, learning standards, learning resources, academic standards, and student outcomes.
      The Department does not offer any substantial programs at University centers. However, because of student demand, we now offer two general education courses at Lynnwood center each year. Whether or not we continue doing this will depend upon enrollment and faculty availability. 

Standard Three: Students

  1.  
    1. Describe departmental policies and advising services for students. How are advisors informed and prepared for their duties? Provide copies of student handbooks and other advisory literature (Also relates to Standards 2 and 4.)

  2.  
    1. Briefly describe how the department determines if a course (not covered by the Direct Transfer Agreement or the Table of Course Equivalency) from another institution is acceptable for transfer credit. (Also related to Standard 2.)

  3.  
    1. Describe how the department recruits students through internal and external publicity. Include publications, reference web content, etc. If the department's programs are accredited by a professional association or approved by the state, describe how the accreditation or approval status is represented in your publicity.
      We continue to manage and award yearly scholarships from the Dennis W. Farrell Foundation to pre-medical students. The number of scholarships given has increased over the five years. Specifically, we have awarded 62 Dennis Farrell scholarships and another 17 to incoming freshmen. 
      
      The Natural Science Seminar series continues to be an important biweekly event which brings students, faculty and members of the local community together. A list of recent seminars is included in supporting materials. 
      
      The annual Greenhouse Open House continues to be held and draws many individuals from across campus and from the Ellensburg community. 

  4.  
    1. Describe how students are guided to remedial and support services.

  5.  
    1. Describe student services offered through the department including any professional societies or faculty-led clubs or organizations and their activities.
      We also try to enrich student life on campus by affording students the opportunity to collaborate with faculty on research projects, participate in SOURCE and Biology Club activities, and attend the bi-weekly Natural Science Seminar presentations. Finally, those curious about the identity and/or biology of organisms (e.g. plants, mushrooms, algae, bacteria, insects, spiders, fish, birds, mammals, etc.) can usually find the information they seek, free of charge, from specialists in the Department.

  6.  
    1. Describe student accomplishments over the past three years.
      We have greatly increased our efforts in mentoring students and involving them in research projects. The increasing number of SOURCE presentations reflect this effort by the faculty. 

  7.  
    1. How does the department work with student services to increase retention?
    2. Please check all that apply        
         

      
      
  8.  
    1. Describe departmental career placement services or efforts to coordinate with university placement services.

  9.  
    1. Reflect on the effectiveness of the department's student programs and services.


Standard Four: Faculty

  1.  
    1. Describe the department's faculty staffing plan including how the department reviews and assesses its ratio of full-time to part-time faculty. Include current ratio of full-time to part-time faculty. What, if any, staffing difficulties may the department face in the next five years in order to continue providing the current level of service?
      The Department of Biological Sciences is a relatively large and complex unit (see chart). The Department employs twenty-two faculty (12 fill-time, 3 half-time, 3 phased and 4 adjunct professors), and seven graduate teaching assistants. We also employ seven classified staff members, including technicians and secretarial staff. Therefore, Biology is a team of 36 persons, under the supervision of the Chair, who work smoothly and efficiently to meet goals. 

  2.  
    1. Describe the department's development activities that maintain or enhance the competence and vitality of faculty. Particularly address development activities intended to remedy deficiencies identified through evaluation. Include activities that promote improvements in instruction, scholarship, and service.


  3.  
    1. Describe the departmental policies and procedures by which faculty, both full-time and part-time, are evaluated for promotion, retention, and tenure.
      Personnel Committee - This standing committee establishes policy and procedures for the regularly occurring faculty personnel issues with which all CWU departments deal. These include reappointment, promotion, tenure, merit, post-tenure review, etc. The committee attempts to fulfill its role in reviewing faculty performance while promoting the mentoring of especially our junior faculty. 

  4.  
    1. Comment on the balance of teaching, scholarship and service responsibilities of the department's faculty. What are the implications of that balance in terms of department goals?

  5.  
    1. What evidence from the Student Evaluations of Instruction (SEOIs) is used by the department to make decisions regarding the effectiveness of instruction? What other forms of evaluation are used? What evidence do they provide? How are SEOI data and other evidence used to improve instruction? What other evidence would be helpful and what would enable you to access it?
      Faculty administer the MFAT and review the comments of students concerning their coursework. Faculty are also involved in working groups that assemble questions to assess students knowledge in specific fields. This evaluation will also be administered during the BIOL 499.1 course. An example of a series of questions assembled by the Cellular and Molecular Biology working group are attached to this report. The scoring of this exam is performed by faculty and the results discussed among the specific working groups. The entire department will be involved in the discussion of these results, however, the implementation of this assessment tool has only recently been initiated. 

  6.  
    1. Reflect on the overall adequacy and preparation of faculty as well as the appropriateness of the percentages of tenured, tenure-track, full-time non-tenure track, and part-time faculty.

  7. Data provided by Instructional Research and other appropriate offices.

  8.  
    1. Faculty profile - Complete Table 4.1 and Table 4.2.
  9.  
    1. Using categories in Performance Indicator Form I, describe faculty accomplishments for the past year. Also include a summary of the most significant artistic creations, scholarly activities, and research by faculty for each of the past five years.
  10.  
    1. Provide current faculty vitae.
  11.  
    1. Provide a five-year history of the "teaching effectiveness" and "course as a whole" department means as reported on SEOIs, indexed to the university mean on a quarter-by-quarter basis.
  12.  
    1. Complete Table 4.3: Full-time faculty who have left the university's employment in the past five years and their stated reason for departure.
  13.  
    1. Complete Table 4.4: Indicate by year for the next five years any know or predicted staffing needs related to program sustainability, expansion, or modification as related to department goals.

Standard Five: Library and Information Resources

  1.  
    1. Describe the adequacy and accessibility of the department's library holdings and online information resources. If the department offers programs in multiple locations, describe access to library resources for each location.
      The biology department relies on the library for access to journals, books, reference materials, maps, and as a repository for reserve material. The Biology department makes extensive use of interlibrary loan services, and databases such as the Web of Science. The library provides us with several thousands of dollars of journal subscriptions and a book budget of approximately $5,500/year. The library is a vital source of information for our graduate students as they develop thesis projects, and is essential for undergraduate students involved in undergraduate research and class projects. 

  2.  
    1. Describe the adequacy and accessibility of library acquisitions related to department course work and faculty research.
      The journals/serials budget has been cut time and time again, resulting in a reduced capacity to meet our student and faculty need. We attempt to make up for some of this deficit by making our personal subscriptions available for students (approximately 48 titles). Decreased serials funding has also placed a much greater burden on the interlibrary loan department, who are understaffed already. As a department we strongly advocate increased funding for books and journals. 

  3.  
    1. Describe the library and information technologies faculty regularly and actively utilize in the classroom.
      Many of our upper division classes have components which require our students to gather, analyze and critique primary literature. The library staff work extremely hard to gather data on our discipline, and many resources in biology can be found by linking to the library home page. They have been very active in trying to find less expensive alternatives, such as on-line subscriptions and the use of state services such as Cascade, to meet our needs.

  4.  
    1. Describe how faculty participate in the planning and development of library and information resources and services.

  5.  
    1. If the department maintains its own library of books, journals, or similar material, please describe the holdings and how they are used.


Standard Six: Governance

  1.  
    1. Describe the department's governance system and provide an organizational chart for department including committee assignments.
      The Department of Biological Sciences is a relatively large and complex unit (see chart). The Department employs twenty-two faculty (12 fill-time, 3 half-time, 3 phased and 4 adjunct professors), and seven graduate teaching assistants. We also employ seven classified staff members, including technicians and secretarial staff. Therefore, Biology is a team of 36 persons, under the supervision of the Chair, who work smoothly and efficiently to meet goals. At present, most organizational and policy work is done by committees with final major decisions made by the department faculty.

  2.  
    1. Describe how faculty members are involved in institutional governance, planning, budgeting, and policy development. (Also relates to Standard 4.)
      Department Faculty Committee of the Whole - The Biology faculty meets regularly (currently we have been meeting once each week). At these meetings final decisions on curriculum, personnel, and other departmental concerns are made. Often groundwork and recommendations from other committees and/or the chair precede these decisions. (membership -- all faculty) 
      
      Curriculum Committee -- This standing committee examines and makes recommendations to the faculty on all matters concerning our undergraduate curriculum. Proposals for course and program changes are submitted through this committee. When not handling specific proposals, this committee discusses broader and more philosophical issues concerning our curricula (assessment, course and program outcomes, etc.) and organizes department- wide discussions on these issues. (membership -- four to five faculty) 
      
      Personnel Committee - This standing committee establishes policy and procedures for the regularly occurring faculty personnel issues with which all CWU departments deal. These include reappointment, promotion, tenure, merit, post-tenure review, etc. The committee attempts to fulfill its role in reviewing faculty performance while promoting the mentoring of especially our junior faculty. Graduate Committee - This standing committee examines and makes recommendations to the faculty on all matters concerning our graduate curriculum. These matters include graduate program policy and procedures, graduate curriculum, and graduate admissions. (membership- four to five faculty) 
      
      Working Groups - Three working groups have recently been established in the Department: (1) Cell and Molecular WG, (2) Organismal WG, (3) Ecology WO. These groups sometimes meet on their own accord to discuss curriculum and advising issues in their respective areas. At other times, they are called upon by the chair or department to discuss and give recommendations on issues of more broad concern in the department. Recently, these groups have been examining the need for a potential reorganization of our B. S. specializations. (membership -- faculty members whose expertise lie in each area) 
      
      Search Committees -- In recent years we have hired many new faculty, and these searches are organized and conducted by search committees. Search committees do much of the work involved in this process while regularly reporting to the faculty as a whole. (membership - - three to four faculty or staff members appointed by the chair) 
      
      Other Committees - When specific situations dictate, ad hoc committees are formed by the chair or by consensus to discuss and make recommendations on various issues, e.g. space allocation, staff hiring, etc. 

  3.  
    1. Reflect on the adequacy of the faculty's involvement in university governance.


Standard Seven: Finance

    1. Describe the adequacy of the teaching, scholarly, and service resources available to the department in meeting its goals. (Also relates to Standard 2.)

    1. Describe department based fundraising activites


Standard Eight: Physical Resources

  1. Comment on the adequacy of the following resources available to the department in performing its mission. If the department offers programs in multiple locations, describe the adequacy of each. (Also relates to Standard 2.)
    1. Physical facilities and furnishings.

    2. Equipment, including laboratory equipment.

    3. Instructional and research technology.

  2.  
    1. Describe faculty and staff involvement in planning the department's facilities.


Standard Nine: Integrity

  1.  
    1. If the department or its programs have statements of professional ethics, provide copies. Include ethical standards of professional organizations the department conforms to.

    2. Describe how the department evaluates and revises its policies related to integrity (if applicable).