The chief advantage of Autocat, as of all such lists, is that it expands the pool of knowledgeable people to whom an individual can turn for help, easily and quickly; e.g., one library helped another to catalog a work in Zulu while a bit earlier a library in Finland helped a library in Mississippi catalog a work in Estonian.
Questions on interpretation of AACR2, the organization of technical services units, appropriate MARC coding, formulation of subject or name or title headings, announcements of job openings, the conditions under which various bibliographic standards should be applied, the use of Core Level records, how to describe the pagination of an unpaged volume, sexism in LC subject headings, these and other topics are all grist for Autocat's mill.
Since AUTOCAT has subscribers at the Library of Congress and other national bibliographic centers as well as at the major utilities, questions relating to the policies or practices of those institutions often generate official responses. Subscribers consist both of recognized cataloging experts and novices in their first job but all have something they can contribute.
The following are outside of AUTOCAT's scope and should be referred to more appropriate lists:
Subscribers who send inappropriate messages to AUTOCAT will be contacted by one of the listowners and asked to stop doing so. Further infractions will cause you to be either unsubscribed or otherwise blocked from further posting.
Archive availability: See How
to Search the Autocat Archives
List traffic: 60 - 80 plus messages a day; fewer on weekends.
Subscriber statistics as of March 2, 2010: more than 5,500 subscribers in 40+ countries
For further information contact autocat-request@listserv.syr.edu
This page has been accessed
< >
< times since 8 August 1997.
Last revised March 2, 2010