Designed by
Mr. Carrigan
carrigankj@yahoo.com

Introduction | Task | Process | Resources | Evaluation | Conclusion
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
|
Format
|
Complies with all the requirements for a awesome diary.
|
Complies with almost all the requirements for a good diary
|
Complies with several of the requirements for a ok diary.
|
Complies with less than 75% of the requirements for a diary.
|
|
Grammar & spelling (conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling.
|
Writer makes 2-3 errors in grammar and/or spelling.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar and/or spelling
|
Writer makes more than 5 errors in grammar and/or spelling.
|
|
Politcal Position
|
You described the political role that you were assigned and did a ggreat job on it.
|
You described your political role but left out a few important things.
|
You described your political role but left out important things.
|
You did not do a very good job on describing your political role.
|
|
Creativity
|
Your diary was full of creativity and thoughtfulness.
|
Your diary had some creatvity and thoughfulness but was missing something.
|
It had the beginings of a good diary but was missing somethings.
|
Your diary needs to be improved quit a bit but you still did a great job.
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|
Preamble
|
Your preamble was creative, unique, well written.
|
Your preamble was unique but it was missing something.
|
Your preamble was ok. It was missing quit a bit of material.
|
Your preamble was not very well thought out and needs some improvement.
|
|
Amendments
|
Your amendmets are creative, clear, specific and well written. You also had 10/10 amendments.
|
Your amendmets are creative and well written. You also had 9/10 amendments.
|
Your amendmets are creative.You also had 8/10 amendments, but they were missing some important material in them.
|
Your amendments wer enot creative, clear or well writtne and you only had 7/10 amendments.
|
|
Spelling and Punctuation
|
There are no spelling or punctuation errors in the final draft.
|
There is one spelling or punctuation error in the final draft.
|
There are 2-3 spelling and punctuation errors in the final draft.
|
The final draft has more than 3 spelling and punctuation errors.
|
|
Creativity
|
The constitution contains many creative details and/or descriptions
that contribute to the reader's enjoyment. The author has really used
his/her imagination.
|
The constitution contains a few creative details and/or descriptions
that contribute to the reader's enjoyment. The author has used his/her
imagination.
|
The constitution contains a few creative details and/or descriptions,
but they dont go with the rest of the material. The author has tried to
use his/her imagination.
|
There is little evidence of creativity in the constitution. The author does not seem to have used much imagination.
|
|
Realistic Laws
|
The laws that were created were realistic and could be applied to the U.S. Constitution today.
|
The laws that were created were some what realistic and could possibly
be applied to the U.S. Constitution with a little modification.
|
The laws that were created were not to the United States standards and would not make it to the Constitution.
|
The laws that were created were not realistic and would not be applied to the U.S. Constitution by todays standards.
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Contribution
|
From my perspective you participated everyday with your group and did
what was needed to get the project done and did it well.
|
From my perspective you participated most of the time with your group
and did what was needed to get the project done and did a good job.
|
From my perspective you participated somewhat with your group and did help on the project but with minimal effort.
|
From my perspective you hardly participated with your group and did not help out at all.
|
|
Attendance
|
You showed up everyday to help out the group.
|
You missed one day of group work.
|
You missed two-three days of group work.
|
You missed way to many days of group work
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Contribution
|
Thier contrbution was awesome and could not have done it all with out thier help.
|
Their contribution was good but slacked in a few areas.
|
Their contribution was ok and I say ok because they were kind of a hinderance to our group.
|
They did nott contribute at all!
|
|
Attendance
|
They showed up everyday.
|
They missed a day or two.
|
They missed several days.
|
WHAT! They were in my group...?
|
| Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |
We all benefit by being generous with our work. Permission is hereby granted for other educators to copy this WebQuery, update or otherwise modify it, and post it elsewhere provided that the original author's name is retained along with a link back to the original URL of this WebQuery. On the line after the original author's name, you may add "Modified by (your name) on (date)". If you do modify it, please let me know and provide the new URL.
This template is based on the original WebQuest template.
To learn more about WebQuery, visit The WebQuery Page.

Return To Kyle's Homepage
Go to Kyle's Favorite History Websites
Go to Kyle's Favorite English Websites
11th Grade U.S. History NETS-S Project