The Washington Teacher Performance Assessment (WTPA) is being developed as the Washington version of a nationally available assessment of readiness to teach for novices. The national assessment is focused on student learning and is designed around the principles applied by successful teachers:
The Washington version adds a state emphasis of involving students in their own learning process and providing student-voice evidence. As a performance-based assessment, the Washington TPA is designed to engage candidates in demonstrating their understanding of teaching and student learning in authentic, experiential ways.
As a participant in this assessment, you will have an opportunity to develop a collection of materials that represents the ways in which you impact student learning in your “student teaching” classroom or other instructional settings. When developing your materials, you will be prompted to synthesize what you have learned throughout your preparation program and apply it with the students you currently teach. Your Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) evidence will demonstrate your current abilities, knowledge, and skills as a beginning teacher on your way to becoming a highly accomplished teacher.
In this assessment, you will describe, analyze, and evaluate the teaching of a series of 3–5 mathematics lessons (or, if teaching mathematics within a large time block, about 3–5 hours of connected instruction) referred to as a learning segment. Consistent with the Common Core Standards and the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000), a learning segment prepared for this assessment should reflect a balanced approach to mathematics, including opportunities for students to develop and monitor their conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and mathematical reasoning/problem solving skills as well as precise communication.
You will complete three tasks for edTPA assessment:
To complete the assessment, you will submit artifacts and commentaries as evidence of how you planned and implemented instruction to deepen student learning in mathematics. Artifacts represent authentic work completed by you and your students. These include lesson plans, copies of instructional and assessment materials, video clip(s) of your teaching, student-voice evidence and student work samples.
The commentaries are your opportunity to describe your artifacts, explain the rationale behind their use, collect student-voice evidence about their learning process, and analyze and reflect on what you’ve learned about your teaching practice and your students’ learning. In each commentary, you will respond to prompts to provide evidence of what you know and understand about your students and their learning. Note that although your writing ability will not be scored directly, commentaries must be clearly written and well focused.
When preparing your artifacts and commentaries, refer to the rubrics frequently to guide your thinking, planning, and writing. Refer to the Secondary Mathematics Evidence Chart for information about how your evidence should be formatted for electronic submission.
The evidence you submit will be judged on six dimensions of teaching:
Evidence for the planning, instruction, assessment, and analyzing teaching dimensions will come from the corresponding tasks. Evidence for the academic language dimension will come from the Planning and either the Instruction or Assessment tasks. Evidence for the student-voice dimension will come from all tasks.
The rubrics used to score your performance on the TPA are included in the handbook and are linked electronically to each task. The descriptors in the five-level rubrics address a wide range of performance representing the knowledge and skills of a novice not ready to teach (Level 1) to the advanced practices of a highly accomplished beginner (Level 5).